<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Power ManagementのトピックRe: TEA1753 PFC performance</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/TEA1753-PFC-performance/m-p/861859#M221</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi，&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you show your test input voltage value and catch the waveform with VIN/IIN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you show the related test PF value under different test condition?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also compare your test result with UM10444 page6 table1/2/3?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or you can try to adjust the capacitor value of C1,C2&amp;nbsp; to improve PF value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:21:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>guoweisun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-10T07:21:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TEA1753 PFC performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/TEA1753-PFC-performance/m-p/861858#M220</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am evaluating the TEA1753 for a LED driver application. I have been testing the evaluation module UM10444 and I have a question regarding the performance of the PFC. I attached a couple of images of the input current to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;UM10444, one&amp;nbsp;at 90W load and one at around 28W load.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;There is significant zero-crossing distorsion in both cases. Is there any way to improve the performance of the PFC? What exactly is causing the zero-crossing distorsion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Niclas Samuelsson&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:17:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/TEA1753-PFC-performance/m-p/861858#M220</guid>
      <dc:creator>niclas_samuelss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T10:17:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TEA1753 PFC performance</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/TEA1753-PFC-performance/m-p/861859#M221</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi，&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you show your test input voltage value and catch the waveform with VIN/IIN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you show the related test PF value under different test condition?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also compare your test result with UM10444 page6 table1/2/3?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or you can try to adjust the capacitor value of C1,C2&amp;nbsp; to improve PF value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:21:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Power-Management/TEA1753-PFC-performance/m-p/861859#M221</guid>
      <dc:creator>guoweisun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-10T07:21:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

