<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Keil vs IAR in MQX Software Solutions</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/Keil-vs-IAR/m-p/250759#M7226</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mce_paste_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BielikM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T15:00:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Keil vs IAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/Keil-vs-IAR/m-p/250758#M7225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was hoping that someone could share their opinion on the Keil vs IAR toolchain using MQX. We want to change from CW to a more stable IDE and compiler, but retain the FSL MQX system. I have seen in the past that there are users on this forum using IAR and Keil. The price between the two seems close, if we retain the MQX middleware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/Keil-vs-IAR/m-p/250758#M7225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cdn_aye</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-03T22:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Keil vs IAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/Keil-vs-IAR/m-p/250759#M7226</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are couple of advantages of IAR. So far:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Full featured task-aware debugging (Keil only has simple MQX viewer)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;- Support for CortexM and CortexA, support for multi-core debugging (Vybrid)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mce_paste_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/Keil-vs-IAR/m-p/250759#M7226</guid>
      <dc:creator>BielikM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-04T15:00:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

