<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MQX Software SolutionsのトピックRe: lwadc vs adc?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/lwadc-vs-adc/m-p/432156#M14461</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Ryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should look into MQX IO Drivers Users Guide, where both options are described, and select the one that you like more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LW means less CPU overhead, less features. Less features might be enough for most applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, for adc, my recommendation is to use the lwadc. These lw io drivers are better and more usable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Sol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>soledad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-27T20:56:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>lwadc vs adc?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/lwadc-vs-adc/m-p/432155#M14460</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone explain what's the difference between the lwadc and the adc on the MQX RTOS? Why is it quicker to use lwadc? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 04:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/lwadc-vs-adc/m-p/432155#M14460</guid>
      <dc:creator>ryangittens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-27T04:13:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lwadc vs adc?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/lwadc-vs-adc/m-p/432156#M14461</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Ryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should look into MQX IO Drivers Users Guide, where both options are described, and select the one that you like more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LW means less CPU overhead, less features. Less features might be enough for most applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, for adc, my recommendation is to use the lwadc. These lw io drivers are better and more usable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Sol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MQX-Software-Solutions/lwadc-vs-adc/m-p/432156#M14461</guid>
      <dc:creator>soledad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-27T20:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

