<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MCX MicrocontrollersのトピックInter-Processor communication: rpmsg_char + tinycbor</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCX-Microcontrollers/Inter-Processor-communication-rpmsg-char-tinycbor/m-p/2150851#M3735</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm working on an i.MX8MM SoC and I would like to manage communication between the two cores using an &lt;STRONG&gt;rpmsg_char&lt;/STRONG&gt; channel with &lt;STRONG&gt;TinyCBOR&lt;/STRONG&gt; library. I couldn't find any NXP driver for rpmsg_char, only the standard &lt;STRONG&gt;imx_rpmsg_tty&lt;/STRONG&gt;, While it works well, I "suspect" it has more overhead compared to rpmsg_char.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What are your thoughts on choice? Do you have any advice or suggestions?"&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gigi1291</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-12T10:29:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inter-Processor communication: rpmsg_char + tinycbor</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCX-Microcontrollers/Inter-Processor-communication-rpmsg-char-tinycbor/m-p/2150851#M3735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm working on an i.MX8MM SoC and I would like to manage communication between the two cores using an &lt;STRONG&gt;rpmsg_char&lt;/STRONG&gt; channel with &lt;STRONG&gt;TinyCBOR&lt;/STRONG&gt; library. I couldn't find any NXP driver for rpmsg_char, only the standard &lt;STRONG&gt;imx_rpmsg_tty&lt;/STRONG&gt;, While it works well, I "suspect" it has more overhead compared to rpmsg_char.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What are your thoughts on choice? Do you have any advice or suggestions?"&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCX-Microcontrollers/Inter-Processor-communication-rpmsg-char-tinycbor/m-p/2150851#M3735</guid>
      <dc:creator>gigi1291</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-12T10:29:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inter-Processor communication: rpmsg_char + tinycbor</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCX-Microcontrollers/Inter-Processor-communication-rpmsg-char-tinycbor/m-p/2152912#M3761</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/253736"&gt;@gigi1291&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope you are doing very well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Actually, in our BSP you can find the &lt;A href="https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/blob/dfaf2136deb2af2e60b994421281ba42f1c087e0/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c#L29" target="_self"&gt;rpmsg_char.c&lt;/A&gt; driver, but unfortunately, we have not an example of the integration with the SDK.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can take as reference the multi core examples inside of the MCUXpresso SDK for cortex M.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Salas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:32:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCX-Microcontrollers/Inter-Processor-communication-rpmsg-char-tinycbor/m-p/2152912#M3761</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manuel_Salas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-15T15:32:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

