<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DPDK IPSec Performance versus kernel IPSec in Layerscape</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/DPDK-IPSec-Performance-versus-kernel-IPSec/m-p/1316183#M8609</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We notice on an LS1046A platform with kernel IPSec (with CAAM) throughput is about 750Mbits/sec with 1G interfaces.&amp;nbsp; Forwarding without IPSec throughput is 950Mbits/sec.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So IPSec with CAAM is consuming 200Mbits/sec throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if DPDK IPSec can beat the kernel IPSec performance by a significant factor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 00:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>giancarloengage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-31T00:29:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DPDK IPSec Performance versus kernel IPSec</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/DPDK-IPSec-Performance-versus-kernel-IPSec/m-p/1316183#M8609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We notice on an LS1046A platform with kernel IPSec (with CAAM) throughput is about 750Mbits/sec with 1G interfaces.&amp;nbsp; Forwarding without IPSec throughput is 950Mbits/sec.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So IPSec with CAAM is consuming 200Mbits/sec throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if DPDK IPSec can beat the kernel IPSec performance by a significant factor?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2021 00:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/DPDK-IPSec-Performance-versus-kernel-IPSec/m-p/1316183#M8609</guid>
      <dc:creator>giancarloengage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-31T00:29:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

