<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect in Layerscape</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287658#M8156</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have an own LS1046 board, with an SRAM on IFC chip select 2,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are not able to control OE low cycle, any value of TRAD in FTM1 register has no effect, the low cycle is always just one IFC-CLOCK (44ns), which is too slow for the SRAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the TRAD field works well for CS1 or CS3, but there are other components connected&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(CPLD, FPGA)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that an known silicon issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&amp;nbsp; ... what is different to CS2 ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we tried exact the same register settings on all CSn, just different address spaces,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any hints&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=&amp;gt; md.l 1530000&lt;BR /&gt;01530000: 00000401 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530010: 00000000 00000000 00000000 85000070 ............p...&lt;BR /&gt;01530020: 00000000 00000000 85000060 00000000 ........`.......&lt;BR /&gt;01530030: 00000000 85000170 00000000 00000000 ....p...........&lt;BR /&gt;01530040: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;015301f0: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;BR /&gt;=&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;01530200: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530210: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530220: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;BR /&gt;01530230: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530240: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530250: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-04T16:50:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287658#M8156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have an own LS1046 board, with an SRAM on IFC chip select 2,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are not able to control OE low cycle, any value of TRAD in FTM1 register has no effect, the low cycle is always just one IFC-CLOCK (44ns), which is too slow for the SRAM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the TRAD field works well for CS1 or CS3, but there are other components connected&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(CPLD, FPGA)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that an known silicon issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or&amp;nbsp; ... what is different to CS2 ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we tried exact the same register settings on all CSn, just different address spaces,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any hints&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=&amp;gt; md.l 1530000&lt;BR /&gt;01530000: 00000401 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530010: 00000000 00000000 00000000 85000070 ............p...&lt;BR /&gt;01530020: 00000000 00000000 85000060 00000000 ........`.......&lt;BR /&gt;01530030: 00000000 85000170 00000000 00000000 ....p...........&lt;BR /&gt;01530040: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;015301f0: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;BR /&gt;=&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;01530200: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530210: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530220: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;BR /&gt;01530230: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530240: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................&lt;BR /&gt;01530250: 0e000ee0 001f000e 1f00200e 00000000 ......... ......&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287658#M8156</guid>
      <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-04T16:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287660#M8157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;sorry, I meant,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;44ns is too fast for a 60ns SRAM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 16:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287660#M8157</guid>
      <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-04T16:52:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287797#M8159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Assuming that 22-/25-bit address mode is used check that IFC_RB2_B is pulled high through a 1 kΩ resistor to OVDD.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2021 05:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1287797#M8159</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-05T05:13:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1288835#M8170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the hint,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried 1K pullup to OVDD, the RB2 is stable high during access, nothing else is connected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately it has no effect, OE low cycle is just one IFC clock cycle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I'm wondering why I need an external RB input when I work with internal TE ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyway, it has something to do with RB2,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when I set the RCW , IFC_GRP_A_BASE[412-413] to 01, which means RB2, RB3 pins are GPIOs, then I can control OE low time via TRAD field, and SRAM works&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but in that case I loss RB3 which I need for CPLD in GASIC mode,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we work in 25-bit address mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate any comments&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1288835#M8170</guid>
      <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-08T07:29:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1289207#M8177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; we work in 25-bit address mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which exactly cfg_rcw_src is used (value of the DCFG_CCSR_PORSR1)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please provide U-Boot log as text attachment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1289207#M8177</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-08T14:15:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1289293#M8178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;currently we boot from SD card, because we have a bug in parallel NOR flash,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we want to boot from flash after redesign&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1289293#M8178</guid>
      <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-08T16:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1046 IFC chip select 2 TRAD value has no effect</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1299197#M8314</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I could go back to check the issue again,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the 1K pull up helps, the patch was wrong done&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:01:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1046-IFC-chip-select-2-TRAD-value-has-no-effect/m-p/1299197#M8314</guid>
      <dc:creator>micha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-28T16:01:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

