<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SEC Initialization in Trusted State in Layerscape</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1174994#M6877</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Done. Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shivesh_sood</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-29T04:55:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Initialization in Trusted State</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1173854#M6868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are running a custom bootloader on our LS1046ARDB - The code performs authentication of an image and passes control. With SB_EN disabled in RCW and the system in SECMON in Check State, the SEC is initialized successfully and can process jobs through the Job Ring Interface. However, when we enable secure boot and execute the same boot code with SECMON in Trusted State, the SEC is not getting initialized and any jobs passed through input JR gives an error code 0x13 (DECO Source) in JRSTAR_JR0 register [ Header Error (Invalid length or parity, or certain other problems.) ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What could be the reason here - are we missing some key differences in SEC behavior and initialization steps when Secure Boot is enabled vs. when Secure Boot is Disabled?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/176027"&gt;@chitra_amzarewa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1173854#M6868</guid>
      <dc:creator>shivesh_sood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-27T13:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEC Initialization in Trusted State</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1174501#M6876</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To provide detailed comments to this post, I may need to share information available only under NDA, which is not possible on a public Forum. Consider opening a &lt;A href="https://support.nxp.com" target="_self"&gt;Support Case&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Platon&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1174501#M6876</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-28T11:56:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEC Initialization in Trusted State</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1174994#M6877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Done. Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 04:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/SEC-Initialization-in-Trusted-State/m-p/1174994#M6877</guid>
      <dc:creator>shivesh_sood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-29T04:55:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

