<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerscapeのトピックRe: Asymmetric multi processing in layerscape LS1088</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067364#M6113</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting up all resource assignment, isolation and protection modules on &lt;BR /&gt;Layerscape SoCs would result in an OS-level complexity code. On the other&lt;BR /&gt;hand, leaving these SoC resources intact and relying purely&amp;nbsp; on the collaborative &lt;BR /&gt;multiprocessing model is not feasible due to lack of protection against &lt;BR /&gt;programming errors. For the reasons mentioned above, no ready recommendations&lt;BR /&gt;are available for running multiple OS'es on LS processors without a hypervisor.&lt;BR /&gt;Our recommendation in this regard is, use virtualization. LSDK-supported&lt;BR /&gt;virtualization techniques are described &lt;A href="https://docs.nxp.com/bundle/GUID-C3A436DA-E944-4F73-9811-2335DEBD04D6/page/GUID-FD70DB59-756E-4A83-B3D4-479C45A2298F.html"&gt;in the online documentation.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For commercial&amp;nbsp; software products, search our &lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/support/support/nxp-partner-directory:PARTNER-DIRECTORY?lang=en#/"&gt;Partner Directory&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Platon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored&lt;BR /&gt;Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bpe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-21T09:59:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Asymmetric multi processing in layerscape LS1088</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067363#M6112</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out a way that I can run two independent Linux operating systems on the Layerscape LS1088A processor without using a hypervisor( Type 1). I see a whitepaper discussion of the same which is tried out in Intel (Twin-Linux). Is it possible to do the same in Layerscape LS1088?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067363#M6112</guid>
      <dc:creator>nithindas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-20T18:26:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric multi processing in layerscape LS1088</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067364#M6113</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting up all resource assignment, isolation and protection modules on &lt;BR /&gt;Layerscape SoCs would result in an OS-level complexity code. On the other&lt;BR /&gt;hand, leaving these SoC resources intact and relying purely&amp;nbsp; on the collaborative &lt;BR /&gt;multiprocessing model is not feasible due to lack of protection against &lt;BR /&gt;programming errors. For the reasons mentioned above, no ready recommendations&lt;BR /&gt;are available for running multiple OS'es on LS processors without a hypervisor.&lt;BR /&gt;Our recommendation in this regard is, use virtualization. LSDK-supported&lt;BR /&gt;virtualization techniques are described &lt;A href="https://docs.nxp.com/bundle/GUID-C3A436DA-E944-4F73-9811-2335DEBD04D6/page/GUID-FD70DB59-756E-4A83-B3D4-479C45A2298F.html"&gt;in the online documentation.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For commercial&amp;nbsp; software products, search our &lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/support/support/nxp-partner-directory:PARTNER-DIRECTORY?lang=en#/"&gt;Partner Directory&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Platon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored&lt;BR /&gt;Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067364#M6113</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-21T09:59:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Asymmetric multi processing in layerscape LS1088</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067365#M6114</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply. Yes I am currently using the kvm qemu and part of the issue is that it is a kernel hosted hypervisor. I tried to get a type 1 hypervisor and unfortunately the costs are very exorbitantly high. I thought it would be good if we have a way to run independent linux OS on different cores.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Asymmetric-multi-processing-in-layerscape-LS1088/m-p/1067365#M6114</guid>
      <dc:creator>nithindas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-21T11:14:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

