<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerscapeのトピックLS1043A RCW clarification</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1043A-RCW-clarification/m-p/851498#M3877</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the LS1043A&amp;nbsp;Reference Manual (rev 4, 6/2018), RCW source-encodings (Table 4-9), the QSPI (0_0100_010x) and SD/MMC (0_0100_0000)&amp;nbsp;cfg_rcw_src values are footnoted with "&lt;EM&gt;Not valid as an RCW[IFC_MODE] encoding.&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone clarify what it meant by this footnote?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mike_palmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-03T22:52:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LS1043A RCW clarification</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1043A-RCW-clarification/m-p/851498#M3877</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the LS1043A&amp;nbsp;Reference Manual (rev 4, 6/2018), RCW source-encodings (Table 4-9), the QSPI (0_0100_010x) and SD/MMC (0_0100_0000)&amp;nbsp;cfg_rcw_src values are footnoted with "&lt;EM&gt;Not valid as an RCW[IFC_MODE] encoding.&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone clarify what it meant by this footnote?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1043A-RCW-clarification/m-p/851498#M3877</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike_palmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-03T22:52:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1043A RCW clarification</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1043A-RCW-clarification/m-p/851499#M3878</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mentioned note means that IFC is implicitly initialized in accordance with the RCW source-encoding (the &lt;EM&gt;RCW[IFC_MODE]&lt;/EM&gt; is not used) in all cases except QSPI and SD/MMC when IFC is initialized by the &lt;EM&gt;RCW[IFC_MODE]&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 03:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1043A-RCW-clarification/m-p/851499#M3878</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-04T03:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

