<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerscapeのトピックRe: LS1088 Single source clocking and DDRCLK</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1088-Single-source-clocking-and-DDRCLK/m-p/830425#M3746</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that the Checklist recommendation is connected with the fact that hard-coded RCWs select DDRCLK as DDR PLL source clock. Initial board bring-up could be more complicated if DDRCLK is not applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-20T06:02:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LS1088 Single source clocking and DDRCLK</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1088-Single-source-clocking-and-DDRCLK/m-p/830424#M3745</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the LS1088, as with other LS10xx SoC's, I understand DIFF_SYSCLK can be used as a replacement for the single-source SYSCLK and DDRCLK, as well as (1088 only), for SerDes PLL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, AN5144 (LS1088 design checklist) notes that DDRCLK 'This pin must always be connected to a 66.7-133.3 MHz input clock.'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a typo?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I use DIFF_SYSCLK only and pull down DDRCLK to GND, as I can with SYSCLK?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1088-Single-source-clocking-and-DDRCLK/m-p/830424#M3745</guid>
      <dc:creator>mcbridematt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-19T06:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LS1088 Single source clocking and DDRCLK</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1088-Single-source-clocking-and-DDRCLK/m-p/830425#M3746</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that the Checklist recommendation is connected with the fact that hard-coded RCWs select DDRCLK as DDR PLL source clock. Initial board bring-up could be more complicated if DDRCLK is not applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 06:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/LS1088-Single-source-clocking-and-DDRCLK/m-p/830425#M3746</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-20T06:02:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

