<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerscapeのトピックRe: PMU Cache counters</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/PMU-Cache-counters/m-p/656825#M2337</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be convenient to investigate the issue as Technical Case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.freescale.com%2Fthread%2F381898" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.freescale.com/thread/381898&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please create a Case and provide detailed description of the test reproduction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-16T03:54:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PMU Cache counters</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/PMU-Cache-counters/m-p/656824#M2336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are doing performance measurement on a LS1043A Processor using the PMU counters. We notice something that seems strange. A simple program (that runs without any operating system) contains a loop that reads from the RAM memory locations spaced of 64 bytes, all variables ( loop counter, address to read and data ) are stored in registers. The cache is enabled. As a result we have that the &amp;nbsp;L1D_CACHE_WB PMU counter has quite the same value of the MEM_ACCESS, while we expected the L1D_CACHE_WB to be quite 0 since no write-back operations should occur and, in fact the L2D_CACHE_WB is quite 0. Have you any suggestions ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/PMU-Cache-counters/m-p/656824#M2336</guid>
      <dc:creator>renatosala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-15T17:48:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PMU Cache counters</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/PMU-Cache-counters/m-p/656825#M2337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be convenient to investigate the issue as Technical Case:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.freescale.com%2Fthread%2F381898" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.freescale.com/thread/381898&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please create a Case and provide detailed description of the test reproduction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/PMU-Cache-counters/m-p/656825#M2337</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-16T03:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

