<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LayerscapeのトピックDrive capability for RGMII interface of LS1021A</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2411799#M16871</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have another question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On my board, eTSEC1 and&amp;nbsp;eTSEC3 of LS1021A will be configured as RGMII mode to driver PHY. But the size of my board is very big,&amp;nbsp; I'm afraid that the too long trace on PCB(about 200到250mm) will cause&amp;nbsp;insufficient drive capability for RGMII interface(250Mbps per data signal) . Could you please provide the route constraint for RGMII interface,&amp;nbsp;especially trace length on PCB based on&amp;nbsp;common FR-4 PCB(Dk 4.2~4.4, Df 0.022)? Cause, I can't find any PCB design consideration on NXP website.&amp;nbsp; Also&amp;nbsp;AN4878_Design Checklist only show the design requirement of schematic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason_in_job</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-08T02:09:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Drive capability for RGMII interface of LS1021A</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2411799#M16871</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have another question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On my board, eTSEC1 and&amp;nbsp;eTSEC3 of LS1021A will be configured as RGMII mode to driver PHY. But the size of my board is very big,&amp;nbsp; I'm afraid that the too long trace on PCB(about 200到250mm) will cause&amp;nbsp;insufficient drive capability for RGMII interface(250Mbps per data signal) . Could you please provide the route constraint for RGMII interface,&amp;nbsp;especially trace length on PCB based on&amp;nbsp;common FR-4 PCB(Dk 4.2~4.4, Df 0.022)? Cause, I can't find any PCB design consideration on NXP website.&amp;nbsp; Also&amp;nbsp;AN4878_Design Checklist only show the design requirement of schematic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2411799#M16871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_in_job</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-08T02:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Drive capability for RGMII interface of LS1021A</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2411804#M16873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;NXP evidence does not give an LS1021A-specific max RGMII length, but 200–250 mm is longer than the related 6-inch QorIQ guideline, so use ≤150 mm where possible or require IBIS-based SI/timing verification.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please refer to this application note:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN13335.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN13335.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are some general PCB layout guidelines commonly applied to RGMII interfaces on FR-4 material (Dk 4.2–4.4):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Trace length: For RGMII at 125 MHz (DDR, effectively 250 Mbps per signal), the recommended maximum trace length is typically 100–150 mm for standard designs. A trace length of 200–250 mm is on the longer side and may introduce signal integrity concerns such as increased propagation delay, reflections, and potential setup/hold timing violations.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Consider using a PHY with adjustable internal delay (RGMII-ID mode) to compensate for skew introduced by long traces.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- If trace lengths must exceed 150 mm, controlled impedance (50 Ω single-ended) and careful length matching within the data bus (±5 mm intra-pair skew) are strongly recommended.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="2"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Impedance control: Target 50 Ω single-ended for all RGMII signals on FR-4.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="3"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Clock-to-data skew: Keep clock-to-data skew within ±500 ps as per the RGMII specification.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="4"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Series termination: Adding a 22–33 Ω series resistor near the driver output can help dampen reflections on longer traces.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2411804#M16873</guid>
      <dc:creator>yipingwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-08T02:47:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Drive capability for RGMII interface of LS1021A</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2412189#M16875</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, yiping:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;typically 100mm length could be&amp;nbsp;guaranteed&amp;nbsp;drive capability for RGMII interface, right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2412189#M16875</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jason_in_job</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-09T01:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Drive capability for RGMII interface of LS1021A</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2412192#M16876</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, 100 mm is typically a good and conservative RGMII routing target.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please also verify the RGMII timing/skew and PHY internal-delay configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Drive-capability-for-RGMII-interface-of-LS1021A/m-p/2412192#M16876</guid>
      <dc:creator>yipingwang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-09T02:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

