<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Possible cache coherency issue due to Cortex-A72 erratum on LS1046 in Layerscape</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1853785#M14218</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for clearing this out. &lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_slightly-smiling-face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mughees&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mughees</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-24T19:06:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible cache coherency issue due to Cortex-A72 erratum on LS1046</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1852749#M14210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Arm has an erratum (&lt;A href="https://developer.arm.com/documentation/epm012079/latest/" target="_blank"&gt;Cortex-A72 MPCore Software Developers Errata Notice Version 11.0 (arm.com)&lt;/A&gt;) for Cortex-A72 that says:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"854172: An External Data Snoop Might Cause Data Corruption When An Evict Transaction Is Pending"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to know if this erratum applies to LS1046 processors as well and if the workaround is implemented in the firmware, bootloader etc.?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1852749#M14210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mughees</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-23T18:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible cache coherency issue due to Cortex-A72 erratum on LS1046</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1853675#M14217</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;The mentioned ARM Errata is not affecting to the LS1046A due NXP doesn't have the configuration mentioned by ARM , read below:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;854172: An external data snoop might cause data corruption when an Evict transaction is pending&lt;BR /&gt;Category C&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Configurations affected&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Systems using a non-ARM CHI-based interconnect that implement a snoop filter that can track cache lines with &lt;EM&gt;Shared Clean&lt;/EM&gt; (SC) state to the precise CPU cluster.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1853675#M14217</guid>
      <dc:creator>LFGP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-24T18:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible cache coherency issue due to Cortex-A72 erratum on LS1046</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1853785#M14218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for clearing this out. &lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_slightly-smiling-face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mughees&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Layerscape/Possible-cache-coherency-issue-due-to-Cortex-A72-erratum-on/m-p/1853785#M14218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mughees</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-24T19:06:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

