<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MC13211 VS MC13213 in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC13211-VS-MC13213/m-p/157969#M9237</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helv; font-size: 2;"&gt;I'm was using smac in MC13213 where the device goes to sleep mode (stop mode 3) and wakes up via a keyboard interrupt (PORTA/KBI), it worked fine. I changed the chip to MC13211 which has no difference except the RAM/ROM size.. The problem I faced after using the MC13211 chip is that I found there is a 600uA current draw in the sleep mode which is supposed to be less than 1uA!!! The same code on the same hardware draws 1uA if I use MC13213,, but when I use MC13211 the current start ramping from 50uA up to 600uA !! could anyone explain what is going.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helv; font-size: 2;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ehab&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>e2saleh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T17:05:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MC13211 VS MC13213</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC13211-VS-MC13213/m-p/157969#M9237</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helv; font-size: 2;"&gt;I'm was using smac in MC13213 where the device goes to sleep mode (stop mode 3) and wakes up via a keyboard interrupt (PORTA/KBI), it worked fine. I changed the chip to MC13211 which has no difference except the RAM/ROM size.. The problem I faced after using the MC13211 chip is that I found there is a 600uA current draw in the sleep mode which is supposed to be less than 1uA!!! The same code on the same hardware draws 1uA if I use MC13213,, but when I use MC13211 the current start ramping from 50uA up to 600uA !! could anyone explain what is going.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Helv; font-size: 2;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ehab&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC13211-VS-MC13213/m-p/157969#M9237</guid>
      <dc:creator>e2saleh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T17:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC13211 VS MC13213</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC13211-VS-MC13213/m-p/157970#M9238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello e2saleh,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I think it is 99%, that is caused by any floating pins. Even it is inside the MCU (not pins outside).&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Check every port declared to output or input with pullup enabled.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I faced the sam issue yesterday.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hope it helps.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Peter&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC13211-VS-MC13213/m-p/157970#M9238</guid>
      <dc:creator>FPatrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-31T16:15:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

