<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit MicrocontrollersのトピックData packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154351#M8686</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi all,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would like to switch message confirmation off (i.e. the recipient does not have to acknowledge the received message/packet). I've set mpPacket-&amp;gt;msgData.dataReq.txOptions = 0 but&amp;nbsp;messages are still being acknowledged. Any other suggestions?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Philip&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>phlp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-08T22:22:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154351#M8686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi all,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would like to switch message confirmation off (i.e. the recipient does not have to acknowledge the received message/packet). I've set mpPacket-&amp;gt;msgData.dataReq.txOptions = 0 but&amp;nbsp;messages are still being acknowledged. Any other suggestions?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Philip&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154351#M8686</guid>
      <dc:creator>phlp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-08T22:22:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154352#M8687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Phillip,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;By removing "gTxOptsAck_c" from the txOptions you will NOT get any over the air acknowlegdements.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But you will still receive a mcps-data.confirm saying that the packet was succesfully transmitted.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Without a protocol analyzer to see the over the air data you will not see any difference.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Br,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mads&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154352#M8687</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T12:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154353#M8688</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks for the info Mads. One more question: I'm transmitting real-time sensor data&amp;nbsp;over a Zigbee star network at about 20 Hz per sensor. Due to the real-time nature lost&amp;nbsp; packets do not have&amp;nbsp;to be&amp;nbsp;retransmitted. Can you make&amp;nbsp;suggestions to optimise the network for performance? My&amp;nbsp;problem is that the coordinator is being overwelmed by the amout of data from&amp;nbsp;the end-devices (sensors) and consequently the coordinator does not have time to scan for new&amp;nbsp;sensors after a few of the sensors has connected.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Philip&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154353#M8688</guid>
      <dc:creator>phlp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T18:53:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154354#M8689</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Phillip.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I can only suggest that you send your data less frequent. 802.15.4 does not allow you to send too much data. It is a 250 physical link. which allow you around 115Kbit theoretically.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;you are properly on the limit.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;other than that, do not transmit the data over the uart all the time as this also steals alot of CPU bandwidth.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Br,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mads&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:32:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154354#M8689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T19:32:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154355#M8690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks Mads. I'll look more closely at the UART issue.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Philip&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:37:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154355#M8690</guid>
      <dc:creator>phlp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-09T19:37:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packet acknowledgement (MAC code base)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154356#M8691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi everyone:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my zigbee happen data lost ,can you help me ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Data-packet-acknowledgement-MAC-code-base/m-p/154356#M8691</guid>
      <dc:creator>竹隐杨</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-09T07:09:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

