<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit MicrocontrollersのトピックRe: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148069#M7615</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello BP,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I take it the two batteries are connected in parallel to increase the current capacity.&amp;nbsp; What is the worst case peak current draw by all components in the system?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The BAT54A is&amp;nbsp;a small Schottky diode with&amp;nbsp;quite high internal resistance.&amp;nbsp; According to its datasheet, the forward voltage drop will be about 400mV for a 10mA load, but this will increase to 1 volt for a 100mA load.&amp;nbsp; I assume you have parallelled both diode sections to halve the effective resistance.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It is also possible that your long term logging of Vdd may miss short term voltage dips of a few milliseconds, but these might be&amp;nbsp;deep enough to cause a reset.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mac&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Message Edited by bigmac on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2008-04-22&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;03:26 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-22T00:24:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148064#M7610</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;LVD is activated automatically at any reset. And configured for "Force an MCU reset when LVDF = 1."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Low-voltage detection threshold — low range VLVDL: (LC60 datasheet, page 326)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Courier New';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; min&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;typ&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; max&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Courier New';"&gt;(VDD falling)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.76&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.88 V&lt;BR /&gt;(VDD rising)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.93&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.98&amp;nbsp; 2.04 V&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If so, how can we&amp;nbsp;expect MCU works at 1.8V properly?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;With these values, minimum MCU working voltage should be &lt;STRONG&gt;2.04V&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;BP.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148064#M7610</guid>
      <dc:creator>BasePointer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-17T15:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148065#M7611</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello BP,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Yes, your interpretation of the data is basically correct.&amp;nbsp; Actually, for a worst case situation, the reset would&amp;nbsp;occur&amp;nbsp;when Vdd reached 1.88 volts, but would&amp;nbsp;then not come out of reset until Vdd reached 2.04 volts.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;As you have observed, the 1.8 volt nominal threshold is subject to a tolerance.&amp;nbsp; What battery technology are&amp;nbsp;you using?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mac&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148065#M7611</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-18T10:35:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148066#M7612</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Mac,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We are using Coil Typed Lithium Battery.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.renata.com/pdf/3vlithium/CR2450N_v06.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.renata.com/pdf/3vlithium/CR2450N_v06.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It directly supplies VDD of the MCU over a so low leakage diode.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We lived some unexpected POR reset problem at mass production.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So&amp;nbsp;while I research on&amp;nbsp;a solution, I saw this discrepancy.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I still couldn't find the problem. VDD of the&amp;nbsp;MCU never drops below 2.3V.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;BP.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Message Edited by BasePointer on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2008-04-18&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;10:58 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148066#M7612</guid>
      <dc:creator>BasePointer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-18T14:56:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148067#M7613</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello BP,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Do you have any short term heavy loads on the battery, perhaps only&amp;nbsp;for milliseconds?&amp;nbsp; Being quite a small cell, its internal resistance may be significant, especially as the battery approaches its end of life.&amp;nbsp; If your battery load is "peaky" you might need to consider a largish electrolytic capacitor (or larger than you currently have) at the supply connections to the MCU.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The series diode could also be problematic.&amp;nbsp; This would need to be a Schottky type for lower voltage drop.&amp;nbsp; What is the purpose of the diode - to provide reverse polarity protection, or to allow for connection of an external supply voltage?&amp;nbsp; For a Schottky diode, you would need to allow a voltage drop in the region of 0.4 volts, and this may severely limit the battery life you will achieve.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In your case, another issue may be if the equipment is subject to very low temperatures - the battery voltage will further reduce.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mac&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148067#M7613</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-18T22:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148068#M7614</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Mac,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There are two batteries and an external supplier in the system. We measured (and logged for a long time)&amp;nbsp;Vdd of products that occur POR at all condition, -40C, +85C, at full load. It never droped below 2.3V. We use BAT54ALT1 Schottky Barrier Diodes that are also low leakage to separate supply rails.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We doubt cold joint or flux residues between MCU pins.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;BP.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148068#M7614</guid>
      <dc:creator>BasePointer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-19T16:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LC60: LVD Status at POR and 1.8V Discrepancy</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148069#M7615</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello BP,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I take it the two batteries are connected in parallel to increase the current capacity.&amp;nbsp; What is the worst case peak current draw by all components in the system?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The BAT54A is&amp;nbsp;a small Schottky diode with&amp;nbsp;quite high internal resistance.&amp;nbsp; According to its datasheet, the forward voltage drop will be about 400mV for a 10mA load, but this will increase to 1 volt for a 100mA load.&amp;nbsp; I assume you have parallelled both diode sections to halve the effective resistance.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It is also possible that your long term logging of Vdd may miss short term voltage dips of a few milliseconds, but these might be&amp;nbsp;deep enough to cause a reset.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Mac&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Message Edited by bigmac on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2008-04-22&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;03:26 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/LC60-LVD-Status-at-POR-and-1-8V-Discrepancy/m-p/148069#M7615</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-22T00:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

