<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit MicrocontrollersのトピックRe: ESD</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125595#M687</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hello AFVR.&lt;BR /&gt;This is a good question. I looked only at the MC9S08GB/GT manual, it includes a statement on ESD on page 259, section A4. I'll patch it in here:&lt;BR /&gt;"&lt;BR /&gt;Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Protection Characteristics&lt;BR /&gt;A.4 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Protection Characteristics&lt;BR /&gt;Although damage from static discharge is much less common on these devices than on early CMOS&lt;BR /&gt;circuits, normal handling precautions should be used to avoid exposure to static discharge. Qualification&lt;BR /&gt;tests are performed to ensure that these devices can withstand exposure to reasonable levels of static&lt;BR /&gt;without suffering any permanent damage. All ESD testing is in conformity with CDF-AEC-Q00 Stress&lt;BR /&gt;Test Qualification for Automotive Grade Integrated Circuits. (http://www.aecouncil.com/) This devicewas&lt;BR /&gt;qualified to AEC-Q100 Rev E. A device is considered to have failed if, after exposure to ESD pulses, the&lt;BR /&gt;device no longer meets the device specification requirements.&lt;BR /&gt;"&lt;BR /&gt;As a personal statement I've been designing Freescale/Motorola microcontrollers into embedded products for more than 15 years and have never had a known ESD failure.&lt;BR /&gt;ron&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>glork</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-03T20:37:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESD</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125594#M686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello! I'm new in this forum. I would want find if the microcontrollers, in special if&amp;nbsp;the mc68hc908gp32 can resist discharges ESD.&amp;nbsp;It's resistant to these discharges?&amp;nbsp; What recommends to me so that it is not damaged because of this?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I will thank for this aid.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Good bye.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125594#M686</guid>
      <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-03T11:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESD</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125595#M687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hello AFVR.&lt;BR /&gt;This is a good question. I looked only at the MC9S08GB/GT manual, it includes a statement on ESD on page 259, section A4. I'll patch it in here:&lt;BR /&gt;"&lt;BR /&gt;Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Protection Characteristics&lt;BR /&gt;A.4 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Protection Characteristics&lt;BR /&gt;Although damage from static discharge is much less common on these devices than on early CMOS&lt;BR /&gt;circuits, normal handling precautions should be used to avoid exposure to static discharge. Qualification&lt;BR /&gt;tests are performed to ensure that these devices can withstand exposure to reasonable levels of static&lt;BR /&gt;without suffering any permanent damage. All ESD testing is in conformity with CDF-AEC-Q00 Stress&lt;BR /&gt;Test Qualification for Automotive Grade Integrated Circuits. (http://www.aecouncil.com/) This devicewas&lt;BR /&gt;qualified to AEC-Q100 Rev E. A device is considered to have failed if, after exposure to ESD pulses, the&lt;BR /&gt;device no longer meets the device specification requirements.&lt;BR /&gt;"&lt;BR /&gt;As a personal statement I've been designing Freescale/Motorola microcontrollers into embedded products for more than 15 years and have never had a known ESD failure.&lt;BR /&gt;ron&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125595#M687</guid>
      <dc:creator>glork</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-03T20:37:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ESD</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125596#M688</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;I always have trusted in products of Freescale, and now I know that will be difficult that they are damaged in my hands &lt;IMG alt=":smileytongue:" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" id="smileytongue" src="http://freescale.i.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;, are very good, but is necessary be careful.&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG alt=":smileyhappy:" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" id="smileyhappy" src="http://freescale.i.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the answer!&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:49:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/ESD/m-p/125596#M688</guid>
      <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-04T03:49:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

