<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit Microcontrollers中的主题 Re: SCI and ESCI difference</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143290#M6538</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Hello,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;ESCI actually means &lt;EM&gt;enhanced&lt;/EM&gt; SCI, so there&amp;nbsp;should be&amp;nbsp;no problems to operate as a normal SCI.&amp;nbsp; I believe the enhancement&amp;nbsp;actually refers to the optional ability to handle LIN protocol for automotive use, and the provision of a baud rate prescaler that allows fine adjustment of baud rate.&amp;nbsp; There is also an "arbiter" facility&amp;nbsp;for measurement of incoming bit period.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;These additional facilities don't have to be used if you don't wish to.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Regards,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Mac&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-22T03:26:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SCI and ESCI difference</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143288#M6536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the difference between SCI and ESCI ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have an application for 908KX8CP but now that it has come to the end of its life i need to replace it with an other MCU. I want to know if 908QB8 is suitable. In my application i use SCI and the operation is 5V.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143288#M6536</guid>
      <dc:creator>periklis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-21T23:59:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and ESCI difference</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143289#M6537</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Hi periklis&lt;BR /&gt;The difference between a SCI and a ESCI block is that ESCI has some enhancements like the name implies. This means, that with a ESCI you can do all the SCI stuff AND ie. baudrate recognition and adjustment etc. So the QB8 could meet your needs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Saluti Joerg&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:08:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143289#M6537</guid>
      <dc:creator>joerg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-22T03:08:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and ESCI difference</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143290#M6538</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Hello,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;ESCI actually means &lt;EM&gt;enhanced&lt;/EM&gt; SCI, so there&amp;nbsp;should be&amp;nbsp;no problems to operate as a normal SCI.&amp;nbsp; I believe the enhancement&amp;nbsp;actually refers to the optional ability to handle LIN protocol for automotive use, and the provision of a baud rate prescaler that allows fine adjustment of baud rate.&amp;nbsp; There is also an "arbiter" facility&amp;nbsp;for measurement of incoming bit period.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;These additional facilities don't have to be used if you don't wish to.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Regards,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Mac&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-ESCI-difference/m-p/143290#M6538</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-22T03:26:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

