<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 9S08GB/GT A suffix differences in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/9S08GB-GT-A-suffix-differences/m-p/124444#M305</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm, talking to myself again....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found the info I was after in EB652, there is just a few minor improvements that don't really affect me. I am using GT16 at the moment which up until now didn't have a new A version. In all the GB/GT sizes the newer A part is quoted at approx. 70% of the cost of the non-A part so even though the non-A,s are still shown as available, who would use them. I would love to hear a reason for the price difference!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new GT16A seems to have double the RAM of the non-A as well!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message Edited by peg on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2006-07-20&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;06:59 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-19T17:54:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9S08GB/GT A suffix differences</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/9S08GB-GT-A-suffix-differences/m-p/124443#M304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What is the difference between the A and non-A parts in the GT/GB family?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I notice there is now GT16A and GT8A added but it is not clear what is different.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards David&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 06:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/9S08GB-GT-A-suffix-differences/m-p/124443#M304</guid>
      <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T06:09:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9S08GB/GT A suffix differences</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/9S08GB-GT-A-suffix-differences/m-p/124444#M305</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm, talking to myself again....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found the info I was after in EB652, there is just a few minor improvements that don't really affect me. I am using GT16 at the moment which up until now didn't have a new A version. In all the GB/GT sizes the newer A part is quoted at approx. 70% of the cost of the non-A part so even though the non-A,s are still shown as available, who would use them. I would love to hear a reason for the price difference!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new GT16A seems to have double the RAM of the non-A as well!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message Edited by peg on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2006-07-20&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;06:59 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/9S08GB-GT-A-suffix-differences/m-p/124444#M305</guid>
      <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T17:54:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

