<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Recommended substitute for P89LPC935FDH in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Recommended-substitute-for-P89LPC935FDH/m-p/2318109#M24288</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hi,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking for a recommended substitute for the &lt;STRONG&gt;P89LPC935FDH&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Could you please suggest the best alternative that would allow for an easy hardware transition and minimal software changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 23:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Samsonp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-13T23:01:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended substitute for P89LPC935FDH</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Recommended-substitute-for-P89LPC935FDH/m-p/2318109#M24288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hi,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking for a recommended substitute for the &lt;STRONG&gt;P89LPC935FDH&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;Could you please suggest the best alternative that would allow for an easy hardware transition and minimal software changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 23:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Recommended-substitute-for-P89LPC935FDH/m-p/2318109#M24288</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samsonp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-13T23:01:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended substitute for P89LPC935FDH</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Recommended-substitute-for-P89LPC935FDH/m-p/2319178#M24289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your interest in NXP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, NXP does not offer a drop‑in, pin‑compatible successor for the LPC900 series.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The P89LPC935FDH is officially discontinued, and NXP lists no direct replacement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;However, the closest device with minimal firmware porting effort and reasonable hardware modification is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NXP LPC11xx (LPC1100) Series - LPC111x&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/arm-microcontrollers/general-purpose-mcus/lpc1100-arm-cortex-m0-plus-m0:MC_1392389687150" target="_blank"&gt;LPC1100 Series: Scalable Entry-Level Microcontrollers (MCUs) Based on Arm Cortex-M0+/M0 Cores | NXP Semiconductors&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Small packages (TSSOP‑28, QFN‑28)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Low‑power, inexpensive&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Peripherals comparable or superior (ADC, timers, I2C, SPI, UART)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Easy to port 8051‑style logic into ARM Cortex‑M0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- NXP’s intended migration path from P89LPC → LPC11xx&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;LPC1112 / LPC1113 in TSSOP‑28 or HVQFN‑33 packages&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- ARM Cortex‑M0 (fast, low-power)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- SPI, I2C, UART – all present&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 10‑bit ADC (LPC1113/14)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- GPIO count similar to LPC900&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Small packages (down to 5×5 mm QFN)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Recommended-substitute-for-P89LPC935FDH/m-p/2319178#M24289</guid>
      <dc:creator>luis_maravilla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-17T17:58:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

