<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Updated naming convention for 8-bit devices ?? in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130341#M2424</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Hello Alban,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;In the referenced post you are advocating that the 'HC' prefix be dropped for the 16-bit devices, as being more trendy.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.freescale.com%2Ffreescale%2Fboard%2Fmessage%3Fboard.id%3D16BITCOMM%26message.id%3D3699" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.freescale.com/freescale/board/message?board.id=16BITCOMM&amp;amp;message.id=3699" target="test_blank"&gt;http://forums.freescale.com/freescale/board/message?board.id=16BITCOMM&amp;amp;message.id=3699&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;What are your thoughts concerning 8-bit devices?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;To be totally consistent (and trendy?) should we be referring to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;08xxx, S08xxx and RS08xxx parts from now on?&amp;nbsp; Will this also be reflected in new releases of&amp;nbsp;documentation?&amp;nbsp; What about the full part numbers used for ordering purposes?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Mac&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-12T10:48:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Updated naming convention for 8-bit devices ??</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130341#M2424</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Hello Alban,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;In the referenced post you are advocating that the 'HC' prefix be dropped for the 16-bit devices, as being more trendy.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.freescale.com%2Ffreescale%2Fboard%2Fmessage%3Fboard.id%3D16BITCOMM%26message.id%3D3699" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.freescale.com/freescale/board/message?board.id=16BITCOMM&amp;amp;message.id=3699" target="test_blank"&gt;http://forums.freescale.com/freescale/board/message?board.id=16BITCOMM&amp;amp;message.id=3699&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;What are your thoughts concerning 8-bit devices?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;To be totally consistent (and trendy?) should we be referring to&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;08xxx, S08xxx and RS08xxx parts from now on?&amp;nbsp; Will this also be reflected in new releases of&amp;nbsp;documentation?&amp;nbsp; What about the full part numbers used for ordering purposes?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2;"&gt;Mac&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130341#M2424</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-12T10:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated naming convention for 8-bit devices ??</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130342#M2425</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Mac,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;This has already happened.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What was a MC68HC908GP32CFB&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;is now a MC908GP32CFBE&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;They dropped the whole 68HC. (The extra E on the end is for RoHS)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;S08's have always been MC9S08xxyyzzz&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Given that then it safe to always drop the MC&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;and probably the 9 as I'm sure most of the stuff talked about here is 9. If its not 9 then you should specify.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So now the same rules would apply as for 12&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Care needs to be taken to include letter suffixes that describe internal changes and not packaging options though.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130342#M2425</guid>
      <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-12T11:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updated naming convention for 8-bit devices ??</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130343#M2426</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;For HC08 it is difficult to say, a lot of people call them "08's" but as it is an old family, I don't see much benefit to eliminate HC08 as it keeps letter to clearly identify we talk about FSL MCU.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But for the newer parts, HC is redundant and confusing also (because people drop the "S" sometimes).&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would need to find someone in 8-bit to do the cleaning on FSL side...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The MC is usually safe to drop because very little people work with prototypes, noted PC.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;MC means fully qualified.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;PC means engineering samples.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;XC (obsolete) means prototype.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Then, the 9 can usually be omitted because of the context.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;9 means flash,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;3 means ROM,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;7 means OTP.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Alban.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Updated-naming-convention-for-8-bit-devices/m-p/130343#M2426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alban</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-12T21:28:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

