<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SCI and UART mean the same? in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/1390878#M23458</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well Eric Hackett at TI said about LIN bus "Serial Communication Principles&lt;BR /&gt;The previously-mentioned SCI is the dominant interface used between LIN transceivers and the&lt;BR /&gt;microcontrollers that communicate with them. UART was used originally, but fault-free interface via UART&lt;BR /&gt;is known to be difficult to achieve." Is that just about detecting Sync Break? HW that got added to early SCI implimentations to specifically aid LIN support. Oh and IR transmission support with short pulses, probably continues to to types with no A in UART that use a clock and start to feel like SPI.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fast</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-22T17:30:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SCI and UART mean the same?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183571#M13550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183571#M13550</guid>
      <dc:creator>treasure</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T09:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and UART mean the same?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183572#M13551</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as Freescale 8 bit goes, an SCI (Serial Communications Interface) includes a UART (and not much else). So essentially they are one and the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183572#M13551</guid>
      <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T11:45:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and UART mean the same?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183573#M13552</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Yeah it is exactly the same thing. Semiconductor manufacturers name things differently, mainly because of old stubborn arrogance. Motorola/Freescale likely named it SCI because they wouldn't give credit to the name UART, which is heavily asociated with National Semi. Similarly, you will often find Freescale's competition call SPI for "serial synchronous something", as they won't give Motorola credit for inventing it.&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/183573#M13552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lundin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T14:38:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and UART mean the same?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/1390878#M23458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well Eric Hackett at TI said about LIN bus "Serial Communication Principles&lt;BR /&gt;The previously-mentioned SCI is the dominant interface used between LIN transceivers and the&lt;BR /&gt;microcontrollers that communicate with them. UART was used originally, but fault-free interface via UART&lt;BR /&gt;is known to be difficult to achieve." Is that just about detecting Sync Break? HW that got added to early SCI implimentations to specifically aid LIN support. Oh and IR transmission support with short pulses, probably continues to to types with no A in UART that use a clock and start to feel like SPI.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/1390878#M23458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T17:30:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCI and UART mean the same?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/1397355#M23464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you! )&amp;nbsp;I used different semiconductor-based components to create a device for generating &lt;A href="https://hum2d.com/" target="_self"&gt;high-quality images&lt;/A&gt;. Now I realize that I could have saved a lot of money on components. But I will know for the future ))&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/SCI-and-UART-mean-the-same/m-p/1397355#M23464</guid>
      <dc:creator>thetopnxp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-11T11:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

