<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit MicrocontrollersのトピックP87C51 replacement</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/P87C51-replacement/m-p/716086#M22482</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for a replacement for the now obsolete P87C51SBAA,512 processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have fitted the second generation P87C51MC2BA/02,529 device, programmed with the same .hex file as used for the old part.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I notice in the data sheet for the new part that it runs instructions at twice the speed of the old part&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The critical timings in our application make use of Timer 1 so I&amp;nbsp;did not expect them to change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I find that these timings have halved when the code is run in the new part.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this because the internal clock runs at twice the speed, resulting in timer time-out periods also being halved?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:53:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nigelhale</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-12T11:53:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P87C51 replacement</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/P87C51-replacement/m-p/716086#M22482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking for a replacement for the now obsolete P87C51SBAA,512 processor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have fitted the second generation P87C51MC2BA/02,529 device, programmed with the same .hex file as used for the old part.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I notice in the data sheet for the new part that it runs instructions at twice the speed of the old part&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The critical timings in our application make use of Timer 1 so I&amp;nbsp;did not expect them to change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I find that these timings have halved when the code is run in the new part.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this because the internal clock runs at twice the speed, resulting in timer time-out periods also being halved?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:53:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/P87C51-replacement/m-p/716086#M22482</guid>
      <dc:creator>nigelhale</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-12T11:53:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

