<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit MicrocontrollersのトピックRe: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198196#M15996</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I answer myself. The better options that I found:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;xtal 32768&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;FLL mode = FEE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Internal bus clock = 19.922944 Mhz ( tcyc 50.19 ns )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 4800 ( 0.16 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 9600 ( 0.22 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 19200 ( 0.22 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 38400 ( 1.33 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 57600 ( 1.7 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 115200 ( 1.7 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone find better results please let me know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:35:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-14T08:35:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198195#M15995</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, several years ago I had post &amp;nbsp;a message about&amp;nbsp;MC9S08AW32 &amp;nbsp;baud rate and Xtal value.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.freescale.com%2Fmessage%2F25827%2325827" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.freescale.com/message/25827#25827&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks to you I could solve my problem as follows:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;xtal 3.6864 Mhz&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;internal bus frecuency 18.432 Mhz&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI baud rate range in 4800-9600-19200-38400-57600-115200 with 0 % error&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I'm trying to change the AW60 by the GW64, but the last manage in diferent mode the bus frecuency, I can't get at same time the desired baud rates and high frecuency bus ( above 12 Mhz ).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could someone help me ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198195#M15995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-13T22:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198196#M15996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I answer myself. The better options that I found:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;xtal 32768&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;FLL mode = FEE&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Internal bus clock = 19.922944 Mhz ( tcyc 50.19 ns )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 4800 ( 0.16 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 9600 ( 0.22 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 19200 ( 0.22 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 38400 ( 1.33 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 57600 ( 1.7 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SCI at 115200 ( 1.7 % )&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone find better results please let me know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:35:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198196#M15996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T08:35:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198197#M15997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You seem to have overlooked the fact that the 'GW64 device, when using one of the&amp;nbsp;FLL engaged modes, has a maximum DCO output frequency of 20MHz, and therefore a maximum bus frequency of only 10MHz.&amp;nbsp; Using a standard 32.768kHz crystal will produce a bus frequency of either 8.388608MHz or 9.961472MHz, depending on the DMX32 control bit setting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Neither of these frequencies produce acceptable results for a&amp;nbsp;data rate of 115200 baud.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To provide exact baud rates, you would need an ICS reference frequency of 36kHz, to give a bus frequency of 9.216MHz. You could use a low frequency crystal of 36.0kHz, or one of the following&amp;nbsp;high frequency crystals - 1.152, 2.304, 4.608 or 9.216MHz.&amp;nbsp; To my knowledge, none of these frequencies are "standard".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do not require a crystal controlled bus frequency for any other purpose, an alternative could be to use FEI mode, with the internal reference trimmed to 36.0 kHz.&amp;nbsp; This would be of sufficient accuracy and stability for SCI use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198197#M15997</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T15:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198198#M15998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi BigMac, thanks for your responce.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm really not an expert with the ICS ( internal clock source ) management. For the all my calculations I use the Proccess Expert included in the &amp;nbsp;CodeWarrior &amp;nbsp;last version. Working with xtal at 32768 Hz and bus frecuency at &amp;nbsp;19.922944 Mhz the Proccess Expert didn't show any warning or error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you tell &amp;nbsp;me where in the data sheet &amp;nbsp;specified about DCO max output frecuency and related bus frecuency ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank in advance !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198198#M15998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T01:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198199#M15999</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Page 27 Section 3.9 of the datasheet not the reference manual&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many a time the peculiarities of new devices are not properly allowed for in Processor Expert.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:07:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198199#M15999</guid>
      <dc:creator>peg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T06:07:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198200#M16000</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Peg, thank for your fast responce. I'm reading the page 27 of the data sheet but I understand that this information related only to internal clock source that is not my case because I use external reference clock via xtal.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the incovenience !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198200#M16000</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T09:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198201#M16001</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The important parameter here is the trimmed DCO frequency range 16-20 MHz on page 27.&amp;nbsp; The DCO is utilised for both FEI and FEE modes.&amp;nbsp; The maximum bus&amp;nbsp;frequency is the DCO frequency divided by two.&amp;nbsp; When the ICS is setup for the wide&amp;nbsp;reference frequency&amp;nbsp;range (31.5 - 39.063 kHz), the DCO output will be 512 times the reference frequency.&amp;nbsp; This means that the maximum bus frequency will be 256 times the reference frequency.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To achieve a bus frequency greater than 10MHz would require the use of FBE mode, using an external high frequency square wave clock source.&amp;nbsp; With this mode, the bus is directly driven via the divide by 2 stage, and&amp;nbsp;the DCO is not utilised.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is an apparent&amp;nbsp;contrdiction between the datasheet and&amp;nbsp;Processor Expert performance, perhaps you should submit a service request to have the matter clarified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198201#M16001</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T20:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198202#M16002</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mac and Peg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understood that the max value for DCO trimmed is 20 Mhz. But reading and reading a lot off data sheets I found a small difference between The ICS implemented in GW64 and the ICS implemented in another family members ( SH32, QE128 ). In these the bus frecuency clock is the ICSOUT frecuency divided by 2 but in the GW64 the bus frecuency clock is directly the ICSOUT frecuency ( please read reference manual page 34 System clock Distribution Diagram ). I think for this reason the PE didn't report warning or error when I select FEE mode and bus clock at&amp;nbsp;19.922944 Mhz.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 03:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198202#M16002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-17T03:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198203#M16003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take your point!&amp;nbsp; I actually did check the Clock Distribution diagram, but missed that detail.&amp;nbsp; This is quite a significant development for the HCS08.&amp;nbsp; I wonder how many other recent devices are similar in this respect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mac&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198203#M16003</guid>
      <dc:creator>bigmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-21T16:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC9S08GW64 - Baud rate question</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198204#M16004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mac, rigth now I'm migrating a device with the AW60 for the GW64. The main features that I rescued are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;4 serial port&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;4 Kb RAM&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Independent real time clock&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC9S08GW64-Baud-rate-question/m-p/198204#M16004</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard777</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-21T22:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

