<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>8-bit Microcontrollers中的主题 MC68HC908QCxx</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128111#M1561</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What about MC68HC908QC08/16: is it a ghost?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It seems to be a valid low cost alternative to 16 pin QB family where you need just some more pin, up to 28.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It is listed on "Freescale's 8 bit product summary 1q 2006" and it placed between 908QB and 908AP high performance / low cost, repacing 908EY16 which&amp;nbsp;definitely seems to be phased-out (why? boh...)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There is a Demo&amp;nbsp;board, a fact sheet&amp;nbsp;and an Errata mask set document. But no data sheet nor availability....&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Any news on that?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Encoder</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-07T17:45:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MC68HC908QCxx</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128111#M1561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What about MC68HC908QC08/16: is it a ghost?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It seems to be a valid low cost alternative to 16 pin QB family where you need just some more pin, up to 28.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It is listed on "Freescale's 8 bit product summary 1q 2006" and it placed between 908QB and 908AP high performance / low cost, repacing 908EY16 which&amp;nbsp;definitely seems to be phased-out (why? boh...)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There is a Demo&amp;nbsp;board, a fact sheet&amp;nbsp;and an Errata mask set document. But no data sheet nor availability....&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Any news on that?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128111#M1561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Encoder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-07T17:45:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC68HC908QCxx</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128112#M1562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MC68HC908QC08/16 has been delayed and is now set to launch later this year, probably late Q2. When the Q1 2006 8-bit Products Summary was put together, they probably felt safe putting it in as "New!"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EY16 is actually on the Product Summary also (down in the Application-Specific Products section and it is very much alive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I have to add the usual disclaimer that any quoted dates are subject to change...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128112#M1562</guid>
      <dc:creator>RockyRoad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-10T06:40:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MC68HC908QCxx</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128113#M1563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Yes, perhaps 908EY is not dead, not still, at least. Its final executioner will be 908QC...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;At just half the price and with only 4 less pin (perhaps not so important anyway) it has exactly the same attractive peripherals, ESCI, 10 vs. 8 10bit-ADC channels, 4 vs. 2 timers and, not least, a low cost modern demoboard. A bigger 908QB which is worth every cent it costs.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;At the same price you may have much more from the wide freescale 8-bit cpu range, either older HC908 (908AP32) or the newer much more powerfull 9s08AW16/32.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Obviously If Freescale would have pushed the existing 908EY which is not bad at all but costly,&amp;nbsp;they would have proposed it at the same projected price for the QC: at that point no matter for 2 ADC lines more or less or 2 more timers. Better an egg today than the hen tomorrow.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;And we would have not another CPU in the (too much) crowded 8 bit arena. I think that they could have better spent their efforts to place something like 908QC in the much hotter middle between 9S08QG8 and the 9S08AW16, with 5V supply too.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What a pity we must still&amp;nbsp;wait...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 06:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/MC68HC908QCxx/m-p/128113#M1563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Encoder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-11T06:50:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

