<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60) in 8-bit Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193413#M15036</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;When Freescale has made a new MCU, but it has not been tested yet, it is called&amp;nbsp;PCxxx.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The PC parts are not for sale, and are given away to important customers, who must have them to shorten the developement time.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The MC prefix means that this is a fully-qualified part. There are datasheets and realibility figures available. They are fully qualified.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In the old days, the first Motorola MCU was the MC6800. It was furhter developed into the MC6801, -2, -5.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Some of the MC680x had an EPROM on board. They were called the MC687xxx devices.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;After some additional years, the processing was changed,&amp;nbsp;and the new parts were called the MC68HCxx devices. A typical EPROM part was the MC68HC705C8.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Later a brand new family was launched. It was called the HC908 family, where the "9" said that a Flash EPROM was used and the family was the "08".&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;A typical part was the MC68HC908JL3.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Recently a new "08" family was launced. But&amp;nbsp;as the&amp;nbsp;ICs were getting smaller and smaller, the name had to be&amp;nbsp;changed to MC9Sxxx, so it would&amp;nbsp;fit on the package. The "9" is a Flash EPROM part, and the "S" declares&amp;nbsp;the family name.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There are some MCUs that are available in special versions, eg the MC68HRC908JL3, which runs with a simple R-C oscillator.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The devices that you mention, I have not heard of. The closest is the MC9S08AW60 or the PC9S08AW60.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If you bought the 9S08AW60, you would get the MC type.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If you got the PC&amp;nbsp; type, you should get a few pieces, and you should get them free.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ake&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ake</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-14T16:15:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193412#M15035</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Can Any one explain me the significance of &lt;STRONG&gt;MC,PC,S&lt;/STRONG&gt; conventions.(eg &lt;STRONG&gt;MC&lt;/STRONG&gt;HCS908AW60/&lt;STRONG&gt;PC&lt;/STRONG&gt;HCS908AW60/&lt;STRONG&gt;S9&lt;/STRONG&gt;HCS908AW60). I understand they stand for fully qualified,Product Engineering,Auto Qualified respectively.But what does that mean.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If I were to buy MCUs in bulk will I be given only MCxxxxxxx? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks in Advance!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193412#M15035</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T11:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193413#M15036</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;When Freescale has made a new MCU, but it has not been tested yet, it is called&amp;nbsp;PCxxx.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The PC parts are not for sale, and are given away to important customers, who must have them to shorten the developement time.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The MC prefix means that this is a fully-qualified part. There are datasheets and realibility figures available. They are fully qualified.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In the old days, the first Motorola MCU was the MC6800. It was furhter developed into the MC6801, -2, -5.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Some of the MC680x had an EPROM on board. They were called the MC687xxx devices.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;After some additional years, the processing was changed,&amp;nbsp;and the new parts were called the MC68HCxx devices. A typical EPROM part was the MC68HC705C8.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Later a brand new family was launched. It was called the HC908 family, where the "9" said that a Flash EPROM was used and the family was the "08".&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;A typical part was the MC68HC908JL3.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Recently a new "08" family was launced. But&amp;nbsp;as the&amp;nbsp;ICs were getting smaller and smaller, the name had to be&amp;nbsp;changed to MC9Sxxx, so it would&amp;nbsp;fit on the package. The "9" is a Flash EPROM part, and the "S" declares&amp;nbsp;the family name.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;There are some MCUs that are available in special versions, eg the MC68HRC908JL3, which runs with a simple R-C oscillator.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The devices that you mention, I have not heard of. The closest is the MC9S08AW60 or the PC9S08AW60.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If you bought the 9S08AW60, you would get the MC type.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If you got the PC&amp;nbsp; type, you should get a few pieces, and you should get them free.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ake&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193413#M15036</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T16:15:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193414#M15037</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Ake,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Howz life in Spain!!!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ok!!! My devices were&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;MC9S08DZ60MLF&lt;BR /&gt;PC9S08DZ60F0MLF&lt;BR /&gt;S9S08DZ60F1MLF&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;And not AW family..To be more familiar I converted DZ to AW &lt;IMG alt=":smileysurprised:" class="emoticon emoticon-smileysurprised" id="smileysurprised" src="http://freescale.i.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-surprised.gif" title="Smiley Surprised" /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I'm satisfied with the answers for MC and PC.But what about &lt;STRONG&gt;S&lt;/STRONG&gt;9S08DZ60F1MLF&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Message Edited by Geo*** on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2008-10-14&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;10:53 AM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193414#M15037</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T16:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193415#M15038</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello All,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;S=Auto Qualified&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; ???? What does that mean ..Anything to do with Automotive field ???&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;For Heaven's sake somebody reply &lt;IMG alt=":smileysad:" class="emoticon emoticon-smileysad" id="smileysad" src="http://freescale.i.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif" title="Smiley Sad" /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What are Freescalers here doing &lt;IMG alt=":smileymad:" class="emoticon emoticon-smileymad" id="smileymad" src="http://freescale.i.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-mad.gif" title="Smiley Mad" /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;S&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;9S08DZ60==&amp;gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;9==&amp;gt;Flash Type&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;S08==&amp;gt;Core&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;DZ==&amp;gt;Family&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;60==&amp;gt;Approx Flash size in kB.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Message Edited by Geo*** on &lt;SPAN class="date_text"&gt;2008-10-14&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_text"&gt;02:16 PM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193415#M15038</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T20:13:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193416#M15039</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;It means the part has been qualified for automotive applications.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---Tom&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193416#M15039</guid>
      <dc:creator>J2MEJediMaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T20:16:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193417#M15040</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks a lot !&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193417#M15040</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T20:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193418#M15041</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Will this be standard part number for all Freescale micros or just for the S08 family? Where is the documentation about this?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Great idea to choose S9 as prefix so we won't at all confuse it with neither S908 nor Motorola s-records...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess it will follow the tradition of logcial and intuitive part numbers. Look at the different part numbers the S12 went through for example:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- First there was 68HC12.&lt;BR /&gt;- Then a new device was made, called "Star12".&lt;BR /&gt;- Star12 was renamed to MC9S12*****.&lt;BR /&gt;- Some silicon masks were named MCS12*****B.&lt;BR /&gt;- When the bugs were fixed, new silicon masks got the name MC9S12***** back. Or sometimes it was called "C" just to confuse, but this isn't an official part number.&lt;BR /&gt;- New letter "E" was appended with RoHS.&lt;BR /&gt;- New letters were appended with tape &amp;amp; reel. This part number was completely undocumented anywhere, it just popped up out of the blue without any info about it. As far as I know, it is still undocumented.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can be **bleep** sure the Freescale retailers and their app engineers are utterly clueless as soon as you ask them about part numbers and silicon masks. Every single one of them I have met will always "get back to me" as soon as I ask about it. Or alternatively smile, nod and give me the wrong chip. I have received 68HC12 when I wanted S12. I have received S12DG128B when I explicitly asked for one without "B".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I really don't blame the retailers either, because Freescale keeps spitting out hundreds of new MCUs each year and the structure of the part numbers is constantly changing...&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193418#M15041</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lundin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-14T22:26:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193419#M15042</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I have not heard about the S9S08 before.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But I guess that Tom is right. It must be some special qualification, made for one ctm I'd suppose.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ake&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:01:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193419#M15042</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T15:01:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193420#M15043</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi Ake,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I think its not a custom made.&lt;BR /&gt;Its from datasheet MC9S08DZ60 Series Data Sheet, Rev. 4, Page 405 ,MC9S08DZ128 Series Data Sheet, Rev. 1 page 447.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193420#M15043</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T15:18:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193421#M15044</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Here is a link to Freescale's official site:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=S08D&amp;amp;nodeId=016246844929941644&amp;amp;tab=Buy_Parametric_Tab&amp;amp;fromSearch=false" target="test_blank"&gt;http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=S08D&amp;amp;nodeId=016246844929941644&amp;amp;tab=Buy_Parametric_Tab&amp;amp;fromSearch=false&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Such a bright idea to change the part number... not even Freescale themselves know about it. I wonder what part the retailer will give me when I ask for S9... probably a STR9 from ST Microelectronics.&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193421#M15044</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lundin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T15:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193422#M15045</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hello All,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Auto Qualified &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(S)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;and Fully Qualified&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;(MC&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;).&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Whats the difference in MCU ??? Is it the peripheral quality??(All the periperals are same!!!)&amp;nbsp; ? Silicon used? Protection against EMI/EMC extra in &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;S&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:47:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193422#M15045</guid>
      <dc:creator>denny_george</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T15:47:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193423#M15046</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Now I see. MC is Fully Qaulified and S is Auto Qualified (as you earlier said).&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So you want to know what the Auto Qualified stands for.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;OK, I will try to find it out.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Or maybe Tom can tell us?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ake&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193423#M15046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T17:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193424#M15047</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I am assuming--dangerously, it now appears--that auto qualified means for automotive applications. Which means the thing would be ruggedized, capable of operating under extreme conditions of temperature and humidity. In other words, not a benign operating environment like that found in consumer electronics or electronic gear that runs in an office or even on a factory floor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rather than start a misconception that would makes things worse, Ake, could you please find out what these things mean? I'm going to shut up before I possibly confuse things more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;---Tom&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193424#M15047</guid>
      <dc:creator>J2MEJediMaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T20:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193425#M15048</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;OK, I have got a paper describing the differences between the Auto and the Consumer/Industrial quality procedures.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV class="O"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;•&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In general, FSL offers two types of qual tiers for MCUs – Auto qualification and C&amp;amp;I qualification.&lt;BR /&gt;• Products that follow the Auto or C&amp;amp;I qual tier vary by both the qualification process and the production test flow that they receive.&lt;BR /&gt;• Auto qualified parts follow a much more demanding qualification process – AEC (Automotive Electronics Council) Q100 Grade 1 qual flow.&amp;nbsp; The AEC Q100 qual flow is an Auto standard qualification process that all of the major OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers require for nearly all of their applications.&lt;BR /&gt;• The results of an AEC Q100 qualification are documented in a product’s PPAP (Production Part Approval Process).&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;• PPAPs only exist for Auto qualified products.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So I think that when exchaning the common MC with an S, the part has to go thru AEG testing.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Regards,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ake&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/193425#M15048</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-15T21:46:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding MC,PC,S9 conventions.(eg MCHCS908AW60)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/2016890#M24091</link>
      <description>MC = qualified&lt;BR /&gt;PC is eng sample level</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 06:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/8-bit-Microcontrollers/Regarding-MC-PC-S9-conventions-eg-MCHCS908AW60/m-p/2016890#M24091</guid>
      <dc:creator>robin_dd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-19T06:15:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

