<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASIL D &amp;amp;&amp;amp; Ethernet Communications in SafeAssure Community (Archived)</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-Community-Archived/ASIL-D-amp-amp-Ethernet-Communications/m-p/1459393#M1158</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All cores on the S32G2 can communicate with either the PFE or GMAC, so any of the cores can be used for ethernet communication. The safety concept for ASIL D ethernet communication is that end to end protection will be applied and verified by an ASIL D core. Assumption 24559 in the Addendum attachment to the safety manual describes this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alison&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 13:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nxa11829</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-17T13:53:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASIL D &amp;&amp; Ethernet Communications</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-Community-Archived/ASIL-D-amp-amp-Ethernet-Communications/m-p/1453046#M1157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi SafeAssure Community:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This question around automotive ethernet on the S32-G2 and how it can be used in a functional safety environment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My current understanding is that only the non-realtime cores of the S32-G2 can communicate with its PHY, meaning the G2 should not be used to communicate on Automotive Ethernet for anything safety-critical (i.e. ASIL-D) (as only realtime OS can be safety critical?). I'm guessing I must be missing something fundamental as I can't imagine that NXP would make this design decision.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please can you confirm we can use the G2 for ASIL-D-level ethernet comms, and if so, why/how?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 22:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-Community-Archived/ASIL-D-amp-amp-Ethernet-Communications/m-p/1453046#M1157</guid>
      <dc:creator>jparrish88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-04T22:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASIL D &amp;&amp; Ethernet Communications</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-Community-Archived/ASIL-D-amp-amp-Ethernet-Communications/m-p/1459393#M1158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All cores on the S32G2 can communicate with either the PFE or GMAC, so any of the cores can be used for ethernet communication. The safety concept for ASIL D ethernet communication is that end to end protection will be applied and verified by an ASIL D core. Assumption 24559 in the Addendum attachment to the safety manual describes this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alison&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 13:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/SafeAssure-Community-Archived/ASIL-D-amp-amp-Ethernet-Communications/m-p/1459393#M1158</guid>
      <dc:creator>nxa11829</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-17T13:53:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

