<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 9sdp256 vs 9sdt256 in S12 / MagniV Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172523#M5863</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;Also, early versions of DP256 which can be found on evaluation boards are full of nasty silicon bugs&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have severe problems with electrostatic discharge with DG256; I apply 8KV air discharge and controller resets. Do you know if early versions of DG256 have problems with electrostatic discharge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nikos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric_t</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-03T23:29:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>9sdp256 vs 9sdt256</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172520#M5860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can somone tell me the exact&amp;nbsp; difference between the 9sdp256 and 9sdt256. Are they interchanable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They both have the same datasheet. What should I search for in the datasheet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any cross reference chart avaliable ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks helping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Untel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172520#M5860</guid>
      <dc:creator>untel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-29T00:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9sdp256 vs 9sdt256</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172521#M5861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should search in the datasheet for derivative differencies. DP has 5 MSCAN modules and J1850/BDLC. DT - 3 MSCAN's (CAN0, CAN1, CAN4) and no J1850/BDLC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172521#M5861</guid>
      <dc:creator>kef</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-29T04:30:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9sdp256 vs 9sdt256</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172522#M5862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, early versions of DP256 which can be found on evaluation boards are full of nasty silicon bugs. If you buy an evaluation board with a DP256 on it, make sure to replace the chip with the most up-to-date mask set and read all erratas carefully.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you plan to use DT256 in production, you may as well put that chip on instead, they are pin compatible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172522#M5862</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lundin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-03T16:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9sdp256 vs 9sdt256</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172523#M5863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;U&gt;Also, early versions of DP256 which can be found on evaluation boards are full of nasty silicon bugs&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have severe problems with electrostatic discharge with DG256; I apply 8KV air discharge and controller resets. Do you know if early versions of DG256 have problems with electrostatic discharge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nikos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172523#M5863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-03T23:29:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 9sdp256 vs 9sdt256</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172524#M5864</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nope, the silicon bugs are related to behavior of peripherals. As far as I know, even the earliest DP256 went through quite tough automotive qualifications EMI- and ESD-wise. It sounds very much like a board design problem to me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, let us not hi-jack this post for that discussion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/9sdp256-vs-9sdt256/m-p/172524#M5864</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lundin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-03T23:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

