<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is microcontroller S9G64CF0 the same as S9S12G64F0? in S12 / MagniV Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/Is-microcontroller-S9G64CF0-the-same-as-S9S12G64F0/m-p/1542667#M18920</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are the same. There is only change in a numbering where the mask set is included into a part number as a code F0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;S9G64CF0N75C …. I suppose you have missed “L” and it should be S9G64CLF0N75C. (0N75C is a a mask set 75C of revision 0)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;9S12G64F0C? ….. 9S12G64F0CLF, 9S12G64F0CLFR : F0 = Mask set 0N75C; R=Rape&amp;amp;Reel; LF=48 LQFP; C- -40~85deg.C.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is confusing combination of letters F0. &lt;BR /&gt;In the first case it should be understood S9G64CLF 0N75C&lt;BR /&gt;In the first case it should be understood S9G64F0CLF&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ladislav&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lama</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-24T11:09:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is microcontroller S9G64CF0 the same as S9S12G64F0?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/Is-microcontroller-S9G64CF0-the-same-as-S9S12G64F0/m-p/1540210#M18919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have several PCB Assemblies from work that contain a Freescale microcontroller with the PN S9G64CF0N75C printed in their body.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this the same PN as 9S12G64F0C? (I have been only able to find documentation on this MC9S12G Family of micros.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luis Mendez&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/Is-microcontroller-S9G64CF0-the-same-as-S9S12G64F0/m-p/1540210#M18919</guid>
      <dc:creator>luis366</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-19T16:08:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is microcontroller S9G64CF0 the same as S9S12G64F0?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/Is-microcontroller-S9G64CF0-the-same-as-S9S12G64F0/m-p/1542667#M18920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are the same. There is only change in a numbering where the mask set is included into a part number as a code F0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;S9G64CF0N75C …. I suppose you have missed “L” and it should be S9G64CLF0N75C. (0N75C is a a mask set 75C of revision 0)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;9S12G64F0C? ….. 9S12G64F0CLF, 9S12G64F0CLFR : F0 = Mask set 0N75C; R=Rape&amp;amp;Reel; LF=48 LQFP; C- -40~85deg.C.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is confusing combination of letters F0. &lt;BR /&gt;In the first case it should be understood S9G64CLF 0N75C&lt;BR /&gt;In the first case it should be understood S9G64F0CLF&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ladislav&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S12-MagniV-Microcontrollers/Is-microcontroller-S9G64CF0-the-same-as-S9S12G64F0/m-p/1542667#M18920</guid>
      <dc:creator>lama</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-24T11:09:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

