imx6q realtime performance

cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

imx6q realtime performance

1,130 Views
ivanstoyanov
Contributor I

Hello,

I am trying to achieve better real time performance on imx6qsabresd board. The idea is to run high priority real time task on a shielded core.

My test are based on cyclictest where I measure the maximum latency. The measured values are between 28 - 40ns.

My kernel version with preempt-rt patch:

Linux qemu 3.14.23-rt20-PD13.2.3 #24 SMP PREEMPT RT Tue Jun 9 16:03:30 EEST 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux

Cyclictest result

root@qemu:~ taskset -c 2 cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -n -m -q -l 100000

# /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us

T: 0 ( 1447) P:80 I:1000 C: 100000 Min: 9 Act: 16 Avg: 16 Max: 28

Going deeper I have found that the latency came from linux scheduler.

<idle>-0 2dn.h4.. 1us+: 0:120:R + [002] 1511: 94:R sleep

<idle>-0 2dn.h4.. 5us+: 0

<idle>-0 2dn.h4.. 8us+: sched_wakeup: comm=sleep pid=1511 prio=94 success=1 target_cpu=002

<idle>-0 2d...3.. 28us+: __schedule

<idle>-0 2d...3.. 31us : 0:120:R ==> [002] 1511: 94:R sleep

Is it possible this delay to come from i.MX6 context switching?

Does anyone have already done similar tests with i.MX6 processors and if yes what are the results? Is it possible to achieve better maximum latency with i.MX6Q processor?

Labels (2)
0 Kudos
1 Reply

506 Views
alejandrolozan1
NXP Employee
NXP Employee

Hi,

Unfortunately I have not been able to find any helpful data for you.

I believe that you may get some information from where you downloaded that Linux Version.

Perhaps this can help.

i.MX6: Has someone tried PREEMPT_RT patch

Best Regards,

Alejandro

0 Kudos